<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dino Rossi governer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://haroyoshi.com/2004/11/17/dino-rossi-governer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://haroyoshi.com/2004/11/17/dino-rossi-governer/</link>
	<description>Does yoshi dream of eating electric sheep?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Coppock</title>
		<link>http://haroyoshi.com/2004/11/17/dino-rossi-governer/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Coppock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haroblogger.com/?p=140#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Ballot Counts Scientifically Inconclusive? 
 
 
Conceptually speaking, all three Washington governor ballot counts appear to have fallen within the margin of error for such machine and hand counts.&#160; Each count of the several million ballots has spread over a swing of several hundred votes.&#160; The last count seems well within any tolerance of error for whether for machine or human hand counting.&#160; Scientifically, this would make the results ?inconclusive.?&#160; It would not seem that an election could correctly result from inconclusive results.&#160; 
 
 
I would suggest that a mathematician/statistician review the ballot tally information in order to assess its actual value.&#160; Scientific inconclusive results should render all three counts invalid. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballot Counts Scientifically Inconclusive? </p>
<p>Conceptually speaking, all three Washington governor ballot counts appear to have fallen within the margin of error for such machine and hand counts.&nbsp; Each count of the several million ballots has spread over a swing of several hundred votes.&nbsp; The last count seems well within any tolerance of error for whether for machine or human hand counting.&nbsp; Scientifically, this would make the results ?inconclusive.?&nbsp; It would not seem that an election could correctly result from inconclusive results.&nbsp; </p>
<p>I would suggest that a mathematician/statistician review the ballot tally information in order to assess its actual value.&nbsp; Scientific inconclusive results should render all three counts invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

